Summary of Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test
This pre-employment test measures candidates’ skills in U.S. legal research and writing. It covers legal research methods and Bluebook citation rules (the standard U.S. legal citation guide). It also covers objective and persuasive legal writing, plus statute and contract drafting. Court jurisdiction and frameworks for legal analysis round out the test.
Use it to hire legal researchers, paralegals, legal document preparers, or legal assistants who can find the applicable law and turn it into clear, accurate written work.
Covered skills
- Legal analysis fundamentals
- Working with legal documents
- Using legal databases
- Legal writing fundamentals
Use the Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test to hire
Legal work demands precise research and exact writing. Candidates who score well on this test can separate primary law from commentary, run targeted database searches, cite correctly, and write memos and contract terms with exact meaning.
Include the test with the application to screen a large applicant pool using applicants’ demonstrated skills, not only their resume statements. Then you can compare test scores to pick interviewees, using evidence rather than impressions.
Using this test can help you save interview time, lower the risk of a mis-hire, and reduce errors in your team’s work. A hire who performs poorly on this test could make errors such as a wrong citation or an unclear contract clause.
Job roles employers can hire using the Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test
These roles depend on accurate legal research and drafting:
- Paralegals research statutes and case law and prepare initial drafts for attorneys.
- Legal researchers find and confirm sources that answer a particular legal question.
- Law clerks analyze legal issues and write memoranda applying law to facts.
- Legal assistants format legal documents, check citations, and maintain accurate case files.
- Litigation support specialists manage case materials and search big document sets.
- Contract specialists draft and revise agreements so each term matches the parties’ intent.
- Junior associates research issues, draft briefs and motions, and present facts persuasively to courts.
- Legal operations analysts improve a legal team’s handling of research, documents, and contracts.
About the Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test
U.S. legal professionals must deal with a massive volume of statutes, regulations, and court rulings and find the one statute or ruling that answers a client’s question. Missing the correct case or citing the wrong one can weaken your team’s argument or delay a filing.
Wetest’s Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test is a role-specific skills test at the intermediate level. Candidates who do well on this test can go from their first database search to a completed, correctly cited draft, which can mean fewer rounds of revision for your team.
What does the Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test measure?
The Legal Research and Writing (U.S.) test evaluates candidates’ core research skills, legal reasoning, and drafting accuracy necessary for U.S. legal professionals.
The test assesses candidates’ abilities in the following seven areas:
- Primary and secondary sources: The test evaluates candidates’ ability to differentiate between primary law and secondary sources and their understanding of the legal authority of these sources.
- Legal memoranda: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to create formal memoranda using a framework. For example, they are assessed on whether they know how to structure an issue using the IRAC, CREAC, or CRAC frameworks, which help make legal analysis easier to follow.
- Database searches: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to create targeted Boolean queries using the LexisNexis or Westlaw databases using terms joined by operators such as AND or OR. This skill helps candidates spend less time searching for irrelevant results.
- Bluebook citation: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to apply the Bluebook rules to statutes, cases, and international treaties. Using the Bluebook ensures that readers can locate each source.
- Court jurisdiction: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to determine whether a state or federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction including the diversity requirements. Selecting the right court helps clients avoid dismissal and delay.
- Contract drafting: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to draft clear and precise contract terms and legal agreements, which reduces the risk of disputes over the meaning of a clause.
- Strategic writing techniques: Candidates are evaluated on their ability to use techniques such as choosing between active and passive voice to frame facts and arguments. For example, using active voice highlights the party responsible for an action, whereas using passive voice can soften a fact that is unfavorable to the client.
FAQ
Legal research and writing is the work of finding the law that answers a legal question and explaining it in memos, briefs, and contracts. It determines whether your team’s memos, filings, and contracts rest on the correct law.
No, this test cannot replace an interview, but it does show whether a candidate understands legal research and writing and can apply it under test conditions. It does not show the candidate’s experience, judgment on complex matters, or team fit. Combine the test with a structured interview, and, where relevant, a work sample.
This test focuses on U.S. sources, courts, and citation rules, making it suitable for roles dealing with U.S. law. For roles under other legal systems, assess candidates’ knowledge of local rules separately, so your team checks both U.S.-law skills and the local rules each role needs.
Hire the best candidates
with Wetest.
Create pre-employment assessments in minutes to screen candidates, save time, and hire the best talent.
Try for free
